home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   SYNCHRONET      Rob Swindell fetishistic worship forum      43,341 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 40,501 of 43,341   
   Digital Man to Dumas Walker   
   Add a network script   
   04 Nov 24 12:00:36   
   
   TZUTC: -0800   
   MSGID: 52885.sync@1:103/705 2b8f2c79   
   REPLY: 71990.sync@723:320/1 2b8f2e51   
   PID: Synchronet 3.20a-Linux master/cc366072a Nov 03 202 GCC 12.2.0   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.21-Linux master/9d3a8113d Nov 04 2024 11:37 GCC 12.2.0   
   COLS: 80   
   BBSID: VERT   
   CHRS: CP437 2   
   NOTE: FSEditor.js v1.105   
     Re: Add a network script   
     By: Dumas Walker to DIGITAL MAN on Mon Nov 04 2024 09:48 am   
      
    > Good morning.   
    >   
    > A question came up on another network from a couple of network admins who   
    > don't run synchronet.  They are having issues with sysops who add their   
    > network via the automated scripts.  They get an email from the sysop that   
    > appears to come from a valid *.synchro.net address but, when they respond   
    > to it, the messages either bounce back or they never get a response because   
    > the *.synchro.net address shown is not valid.   
      
   Oh, that's a bummer. I appreciate the feedback on the Synchronet   
   "init-fidonet" script.   
      
    > If a sysop is just setting up their BBS, they may not yet have figured out   
    > how to get their *.synchro.net address set up (and may not even be looking   
    > to use that feature).   
      
   The sysop might even have their DynDNS set up (and thus their *.synchro.net   
   hostname *is* working), but they don't have their mail server up/working   
   (accepting incoming SMTP connections no TCP port 25). That could be for a   
   number of reasons (e.g. their ISP blocks inbound traffic on TCP port 25, their   
   firewally/gateway/router is not configured to allow that traffic).   
      
    > To make things a little easier on these NCs, would it be possible to have   
    > the script ask the sysop for their valid email address so the NC can respond   
    > to them properly?   
      
   It already does exactly that. e.g.   
   Your node address is 11:1/9999 (Y/n)?   
   Your name is 'Rob Swindell' (Y/n)?   
   Your Internet e-mail address is rob@synchro.net (Y/n)?   
   (if the sysop answers "N", then they have a chance to edit the email address   
   and are prompted to confirm).   
      
   And then the script uses the provided address in the Reply-To address of the   
   sent email.   
      
   I'll put some thought/work into how the script might better validate the email   
   address (is working, or likely to work) and foce the sysop to fix it if it's   
   not.   
   --    
                                               digital man (rob)   
      
   Rush quote #1:   
   Danger plus survival equals fun. - Neil Peart   
   Norco, CA WX: 73.5øF, 16.0% humidity, 17 mph NW wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs   
   --- SBBSecho 3.21-Linux   
    * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)   
   SEEN-BY: 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/187 153/757 7715   
   SEEN-BY: 154/10 30 203/0 218/700 221/0 226/30 227/114 229/110 114   
   SEEN-BY: 229/206 317 400 426 428 470 550 700 705 240/1120 5832 266/512   
   SEEN-BY: 280/464 5003 5006 282/1038 291/111 292/8125 301/1 310/31   
   SEEN-BY: 320/219 322/757 341/66 234 342/200 396/45 423/120 460/58   
   SEEN-BY: 460/256 1124 467/888 633/280 712/848 770/1 5020/400 5054/30   
   SEEN-BY: 5075/35   
   PATH: 103/705 280/464 460/58 229/426   
      

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca