XPost: sci.physics.relativity
From: PointedEars@web.de

x wrote:
> On 1/1/26 08:19, Stefan Ram wrote:
>  > "Paul.B.Andersen"  wrote or quoted:
>  > :that mass could be converted to energy as
>  > :predicted by Einstein's E = mc².
>  >
>  >    I can spot three mistakes here right off the bat.
>  >
>  >         First, the phrase "mass could be converted to energy" is based on
>  >    a misconception, since mass already /is/ a form of energy - there's no
>  >    "conversion" happening. It's like saying, "water can be turned into a
>  >    liquid" - no, water /is/ a liquid.

Correct.

> The basic problem is that you think that 'science' is
> 'automatically true' [...]

No, the problem is that you have no clue what you are talking about, but you
are too incompetent to realize that:



Also, you have posted this twice.

--
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

--- SoupGate-DOS v1.05
 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)