Just a sample of the Echomail archive
SCIPHYSI:
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 177,602 of 178,646  |
|  Physfitfreak to Physfitfreak  |
|  Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) (2/2)  |
|  19 Apr 25 20:34:00  |
 [continued from previous message] >> my dick gave it almost exactly one week of off and on intense thought. >> But that's my dick, and not everybody is a Physfit's dick. >> >> But could it be that stuff equally sensitive and consequential, all, >> require one week of deliberations and weighing? If you know something >> about it put it forward. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > And this "week" itself.. :-) The notion of a "week" must've formed for > human for a good reason, cause it is universal. I think perhaps ages > ago, human found out that it takes 7 days for some difficult thoughts > and calculations to mature. How else could the concept of a week form? > > So it must have to do with human brain and humans found it out a long, > long time ago. Even when they deliberately tried to change it, it never > worked!.. Soviets changed it to a 10 day period for a while, thinking > since communism is based on their own dicks, then such concepts as a > week can only be based on cro-magnons' dicks. > > And it didn't work!. Week toughed out through even communism dickeries :) > > It might have to do with the amount of REM we have in 7 days of nigh > sleeps. Those are the hours where inputs consolidate anyway. There might > be an interesting study of this. I wish some Bozo here has stumbled on > it and can cite it. > > The period of a week is not based on astronomy. It is not based on 10 either, like Modern Human number system is. And is not based on 5 like Roman numbers kind of follow. So it must've come from somewhere more meaningful than mere features of human number of fingers, etc. Time to ask DeepSeek! So fuck you muted illiterate Bozos. You little tribal dimwits. It says it is related to celestial bodies visible to the naked eye (Sun, Moon, Mars, Mercury, Jupiter, Venus, Saturn) and that Babylonians adopted it first for that reason. I think this is bullshit. It must've had a more useful and sensed and felt reason behind it. Is there a freely available AI that has access to, knows, and at least points to scientific journal contents, if not allowing them to download? ... Look who I'm asking this question from. A series of Bozos after Bozos, literally all tribal and dumb. So good luck to my dick :( --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca