Just a sample of the Echomail archive
SCILANG:
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 297,360 of 297,380  |
|  JTEM to Jeff Barnett  |
|  Re: Did Homo Erectus Have a (Vocal) Lang  |
|  18 Jan 26 14:35:48  |
 XPost: sci.anthropology.paleo From: jtem01@gmail.com On 1/18/26 4:29 AM, Jeff Barnett wrote: > So the fact that scientific journals change their ideas and acceptable > assumptions over Journals don't have ideas. They're not people. Only people have ideas. I'm going to stop here, at the very first critical error, for reason that should be obvious to anyone familiar with the definition of "Critical." I'm just going to reiterate: #1. Academia imposes a need -- not a desire but a need -- to be published REGARDLESS of work, of findings. #2. To meet their requirements, and unable to achieve constant breakthroughs/discoveries, academics here rehash old stuff. #3. This nonsense about language is a very obvious example. -- https://jtem.tumblr.com/ --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca