Just a sample of the Echomail archive
RECARTS5:
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 143,450 of 144,799  |
|  William Vetter to Kevin C  |
|  Re: Writers' return?  |
|  31 Aug 14 23:42:15  |
 From: mdhangton@gmail.com On Sunday, August 31, 2014 9:03:10 PM UTC-4, Kevin C wrote: > > First, I failed to establish setting or genre in the first sentences. Do you believe that you need to introduce Christ in the first sentence for the story to be immediately recognizable as Christian SF? I think that it is better to show SF elements soon, because that is what SF readers are there to see. Still, sometimes I set out to write manuscripts where that isn't always possible. >Second, I failed to establish exactly who the protagonist and his men were. Some editorial people say that they want to see the POV character's gender, rough age, station and importance in society in the first paragraph. If the reader goes on very long and is still guessing about what's going on in the story, then I think it becomes problematic. >Third, I introduced six or seven named characters in two paragraphs. It sounds like that could be a lot to handle, but I haven't seen the ms. I have read books with titles like Hooked Thanks, But This Isn't For Us 77 Reasons Why Your Manuscript Was Rejected They are entirely oriented toward making it past the first reader, then the editor. The idea is that if you put everything into a manuscript that they tell you to, your first sentence, then first paragraph, then first page will be so psychologically irresistible to the editorial and sales staff, that it fly through the publication process. You can read them, and maybe feel somewhat more in control of how your writing is received by these people. But you gotta wonder, if these guys know the magic formula for success, then why are they writing How To books. --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca