789830bd
XPost: alt.tv.star-trek.tos
From: cigarmanwine@gmail.com

On May 21, 6:05 am, YourN...@YourISP.com (Your Name) wrote:
> In article , Sandman
>
>
>
>  wrote:
> > In article
> > ,
> >  YourN...@YourISP.com (Your Name) wrote:
>
> > > > > > Even if he made it a musical of naked shaved wookies, it would
still
> > > > > > be better than the prequels.
>
> > > > > Lucas owned it and did what HE wanted. Sounds fair.
>
> > > > Of course. Never said anything about it being unfair. Ruined it was,
> > > > even so. :)
>
> > > George Lucas was allowed to do whatever he wanted ... he actually created
> > > the franchise.
>
> > Eh, yes I know? Why are you writing this? Have I claimed he either did
> > not create it or that he could not do whatever he wanted?
>
> > > Over-egoed "reboot" fools like JJ Abrams haven't got enough talent to
> > > actually make their own franchise, so they have to go around butchering
> > > other people's hard work instead.  :-(
>
> > Again - JJ Abrams could not butcher Star Wars even if he wanted. George
> > Lucas already did that. It's like shooting a dead horse expected it to
> > be more dead.
>
> 
>
> Believe me, JJ Abrams can, and likely will. Everything else he
> (supposedly) makes is a disasterous mess, why would his version of "Star
> Wars" suddenly be something that actually fits and makes sense?

Why do you obsess over Abrams? What's he to you? He's just a guy
earning a living in a tough business. Why do you even give a fuck? If
you don't like his work just watch something else, like your extensive
library of POLICE ACADEMY director's cuts in HD 3D.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)