XPost: alt.tv.star-trek.tos
From: epwise@yahoo.com

ToolPackinMama  wrote in
news:kncb3f$sh1$1@dont-email.me:

> On 5/19/2013 9:10 PM, Your Name wrote:
>
>> There's more than enough morons in the general public who can't think
>> of anything better to do on a Friday / Saturday night to keep
>> Hollyweird happy - those morons will watch pretty much any old drivel
>> simply because it happens to be on in the cinema.  :-(
>>
>
> I said it before and I'll say it again:  bad Star trek is better than
> good almost anything else.
>
> My hubby and I went to see it on Thursday. We got the senior discount.
> We found it highly entertaining.
>
> It's not great art.  It was passable as Star Trek.  It was a fun night
> out.  It wasn't the end of Western Civilization LOL.
>
>

That's ridiculous.  If you think something is bad, then by
definition...it's bad.

Saying bad Star Trek is better than good something else just shows you
are not capable of logical thought....ironic, huh?

One of the first things Roddenberry told writers was that science
fiction is no different from other genres... there's good writing and
bad writing...just because there are spaceships flying around doesn't
mean the writers can take the day off.  This is why most science-fiction
before Star Trek was considered to be for children...the writing was
bad.

Spock's Brain is bad. Not so bad it's good. Not just bad Star Trek.
Just bad.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)