XPost: rec.arts.drwho
From: yourname@yourisp.com

In article , "Stephen Wilson"
 wrote:

> "Sandman"  wrote in message
> news:mr-EE4453.08560605122011@News.Individual.NET...
> > In article
> > ,
> > yourname@yourisp.com (Your Name) wrote:
> >
> >> In article
> >> , Duggy
> >>  wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Dec 4, 8:31=A0am, yourn...@yourisp.com (Your Name) wrote:
> >> > > > What's up with that?
> >> >
> >> > > Nobody has "proven me wrong".
> >> >
> >> > Tell me again how Harry Potter & the Deadly Hallows pt 2 (PG-13) is
> >> > too scary for the intended audience but Revenge of the Sith (PG-13)
> >> > isn't?
> >>
> >> FACT: the franchises were aimed at different aged audiences. Star Wars is
> >> slightly older than Harry Potter.
> >>
> >> But since you won't believe that either, believe whatever utter garbage
> >> that you want to delude yourself with.  :-\
> >
> > Facts without substantiations are just words.
>
> And words without substantiations are not facts.

Actually they can be.

It's not up to me to "prove" anything to morons since I realised a LONG
LONG LONG time ago that they will continue to believe whatever garbage
fills their tiny minds no matter how many ways I prove it, so I no longer
bother wasting my time trying. I simply give the facts ... whether ytou
fools want to believe them or not is your problem, I really couldn't care
less.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)