XPost: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.movies.past-films
From: exquisitepeach@hotmail.com

Merrick Baldelli wrote:

> On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 21:01:42 GMT, peachy ashie passion
>  wrote:
>
>
>>Merrick Baldelli wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Sun, 09 Sep 2007 02:13:14 GMT, peachy ashie passion
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Merrick Baldelli wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 02:10:13 GMT, peachy ashie passion
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> It wasn't the clearest reply ever.  Plus, I'm mousey and squealy?
>>>>>>Go figure.  I was sort of shooting for vixenish.
>>>>>
>>>>>	s'all right...  This one rode the short bus when he double
>>>>>plonked...  it's to be expected he couldn't get an accurate read.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>I thought he addressed that line to Merrick, then dropped down to
>>>>>>something I'd said and plonked it too, meaning each of us.  But clearly
>>>>>>he was so vague, we are just making up our own interpretations here.
>>>>>
>>>>>	No, you read it right.  That second plonk was definitely
>>>>>something you said and not something I said.  So it was a two-fer..
>>>>
>>>> Two-fer huh?
>>>>   Well, someone's kinky!
>>>
>>>	Wasn't thinking kink at the time; but given the definition on
>>>Urban-Dictionary, I guess it's Freudian.
>>
>>   Jeez, I didn't know about the urban dictionary thing.  I was just
>>being a smart ass.
>
>
> 	And apparently on the money.  Given that in New Englander
> Two-Fer merely means, "Two for one".
>

   Oh.  Yeah.  THAT part I got.  :)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)