XPost: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.movies.past-films
From: ANIM8Rfsk@cox.net

In article <9q2Ei.5011$J96.2976@trnddc02>,
 peachy ashie passion  wrote:

> Anim8rFSK wrote:
>
> > In article ,
> >  peachy ashie passion  wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Anim8rFSK wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>In article <5kaqn4F2si27U1@mid.individual.net>,
> >>> "Avoid normal situations."
> >>>  wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>In rec.arts.movies.past-films peachy ashie passion
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>Merrick Baldelli wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>On 3 Sep 2007 02:15:27 GMT, "Avoid normal situations."
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>You seem like a sharp guy. Why don't you come join us on
> >>>>>>>rec.arts.movies.
> >>>>>>>past-films? If you don't know where to start I'm sure many of us will
> >>>>>>>be
> >>>>>>>happy to recommend to you enough DVDs to last you well into 2009. :-)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>	Because I make Mr. Cranky's reviews seem to be sickly sweet in
> >>>>>>their content?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>	Because if you're truly a representative of r.a.m. and
> >>>>>>responding to something just over two months old is an indication of
> >>>>>>how you folk post there; it would interfere with my credo that
> >>>>>>"instantaneous gratification takes too long"?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>	Because you're old news?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>	The choices are just too endless to mention really.
> >>>>
> >>>> Charming. First we get to read lengthy and egregiously tedious postings
> >>>>featuring you barking some fanboy right up a wall for calling Senator
> >>>>Palpatine a "gay politician"... then we endure descriptions from you of
> >>>>your
> >>>>unnatural sexual preferences that in any RL setting would warrant (dare I
> >>>>say
> >>>>it?) the bum's rush... then you smart off to the first person who
> >>>>addresses
> >>>>you civilly besides your Peachy Ashie Mousey Squealy companion.
> >>>>
> >>>> Later days. VERY later.
> >>>>
> >>>> *plonk*
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>   But I can certainly see why he's trying to recruit more
> >>>>>entertainment to come to his group.
> >>>>
> >>>> *plonk*
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Ooooo - he not only plonked Merrick, he DOUBLE DOG plonked him!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>     I think that was actually intended to be one at Merrick and one at me.
> >>
> >>   But it's funnier your way.
> >
> >
> > I wasn't sure -- he replied to you, but he mentioned you in the reply:
> >
> > < >
> >>>>you civilly besides your Peachy Ashie Mousey Squealy companion.>>
> >
> >
> > So I *think* he replied to you but was talking about you, to Merrick.
> >
> > Who can say?
> >
>
>     It wasn't the clearest reply ever.  Plus, I'm mousey and squealy?
> Go figure.  I was sort of shooting for vixenish.
>
>    I thought he addressed that line to Merrick, then dropped down to
> something I'd said and plonked it too, meaning each of us.  But clearly
> he was so vague, we are just making up our own interpretations here.

Ooo - interesting theory.  So are you each plonked, or are you unplonked
and Merrick doubly plonked?  Expiring minds want to know!

--
Why watch the Sci Fi Channel?
For every Flash Gordon, there is an Earthstorm!!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)