MSGID: ea775440   
   REPLY: <10ihh62$1bidi$2@dont-email.me> 0f6186c5   
   PID: PyGate 1.5.2   
   TID: PyGate/Linux 1.5.2   
   CHRS: CP437 2   
   TZUTC: 1100   
   REPLYADDR c186282@nnada.net   
   REPLYTO 3:633/10 UUCP   
   On 12/24/25 15:07, The Natural Philosopher wrote:   
   > On 24/12/2025 17:00, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:   
   >> On Wed, 24 Dec 2025 14:23:45 +0000   
   >> The Natural Philosopher wrote:   
   >>   
   >> []   
   >>> What I learned was that theory is too simplified to actually be able to   
   >>> design a real antenna: All our designs were field tested and adjusted.   
   >>>   
   >>> I am not advocating Pringle cans.ÿ I wouldnt use one myself. But I am   
   >>> not so quick to rubbish them as you are.   
   >>>   
   >>> RF propagation is tricky, and real world objects of no apparent value   
   >>> often have enormous effects.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >> Prsumably you're saying Mythbusters-style "not proven"?   
   >>   
   >>   
   > I am saying that a blanket denial 'because the theory says no' is not    
   > good enough for me, personally.   
   >    
   > To make a waveguide, which is analysable, is quite tricky. To throw    
   > something in place that 'does something' and clearly is *not* a    
   > waveguide, and is essentially unanalysable, is another matter.   
   >    
   > With Gigahertz, as with Heffalumps, you never know...   
      
    Yep, once you get into gHz things get really weird.   
      
    "Solutions" here can work for NO GOOD REASON, pure   
    chance, funky reflections.   
      
    Moved a unit literally four inches the other day and   
    the data rate went up nearly 5X.   
      
    Yes, a cheapo foil-lined tube CAN be a a waveguide,   
    but the math has to work out.   
      
    Me, I can't use waveguides because I need an OMNI   
    signal the way things are spaced out in my home.   
    I use one, sometimes two, wifi repeaters instead.   
    Fairly cheap, work well.   
      
      
   --- PyGate Linux v1.5.2   
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)   
   SEEN-BY: 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110 218/700   
   SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 134 200 206 300 317 400 426 428   
   SEEN-BY: 229/470 616 664 700 705 266/512 291/111 292/854 320/219 322/757   
   SEEN-BY: 342/200 396/45 460/58 633/10 280 414 418 420 422 509 2744   
   SEEN-BY: 712/848 770/1 902/26 2320/105 5020/400 5075/35   
   PATH: 633/10 280 229/426   
      
|