MSGID:  0c19b577   
   REPLY:  3bbc8a38   
   PID: PyGate 1.5.2   
   TID: PyGate/Linux 1.5.2   
   CHRS: CP437 2   
   TZUTC: 1100   
   REPLYADDR c186282@nnada.net   
   REPLYTO 3:633/10 UUCP   
   On 12/10/25 00:18, Andy Burns wrote:   
   > c186282 wrote:   
   >    
   >> If monitoring 'emergency vehicles/installations'   
   >> ÿÿ is critical, maybe consider something using lower   
   >> ÿÿ frequencies than wi-fi ???   
   >    
   > Nah, it was mostly "for interest" to gather a few more values from kit    
   > that's already being monitored. Someone else mentioned water (presumably    
   > as rain) don't forget the fire appliances carry around their own water,    
   > but hopefully it's low down for CoG reasons, while the access points are    
   > mounted higher up.   
      
      Fair enough.   
      
      Now if real, legal, 'security' was an issue   
      then you'd want a solid connection all of   
      the time ... and one wi-fi point likely won't   
      provide that.   
      
      Did a very quick look at fail-over network   
      connections, but almost everything assumes   
      multiple routers and perhaps iptables   
      nastiness.   
      
      Easiest ... add one wifi extender, log into   
      the camera, see whether you get more bars   
      with the main or the extender.   
      
      
   --- PyGate Linux v1.5.2   
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)   
   SEEN-BY: 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110 218/700   
   SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 134 200 206 275 300 317 400 426   
   SEEN-BY: 229/428 470 616 664 700 705 266/512 291/111 292/854 320/219   
   SEEN-BY: 322/757 342/200 396/45 460/58 633/10 280 414 418 420 422   
   SEEN-BY: 633/509 2744 712/848 770/1 902/26 2320/105 5020/400 5075/35   
   PATH: 633/10 280 229/426