MSGID: dont-email.me 4956882f   
   REPLY: dont-email.me df294fc6   
   TZUTC: 1000   
   CHRS: CP437 2   
   REPLYADDR: ldo@nz.invalid   
   REPLYTO: 3:633/280.2@fidonet UUCP   
   PID: Pan/0.163 (Kryvyi Rih)   
   TID: MBSE-FIDO 1.1.2 (Linux-x86_64)   
   RFC-Message-ID: <109t38m$25qlc$6@dont-email.me>   
   RFC-From: Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?=    
   RFC-References: <109h5bq$309ra$1@dont-email.me> 	 	   
   <109snd3$21u94$1@dont-email.me>   
   RFC-Organization: A noiseless patient Spider   
   RFC-Content-Type: text/plain;   
   RFC-Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit   
   RFC-Injection-Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 23:57:11 +0000 (UTC)   
   RFC-Cancel-Lock: sha1:wBvjzRdVrufesm5ReA6br6nrKMo=   
   On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 21:34:43 +0100, Pancho wrote:   
      
   > As Richard says, containers are persistent.   
      
   They can be, they need not be. It is entirely possible to mount an    
   instance of tmpfs to hold any writable storage, which will disappear as    
   soon as the container instance terminates.   
      
   --- MBSE BBS v1.1.2 (Linux-x86_64)   
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)   
   SEEN-BY: 19/38 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110   
   SEEN-BY: 218/700 226/30 227/114 229/110 111 200 206 275 300 317 400   
   SEEN-BY: 229/426 428 470 616 664 700 705 266/512 291/111 292/854 320/219   
   SEEN-BY: 322/757 342/200 396/45 460/58 633/280 281 418 420 509 2744   
   SEEN-BY: 712/848 770/1 902/26 2320/105 5020/400 5075/35   
   PATH: 633/280 229/426