home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   RBERRYPI      Support for the Raspberry Pi device      21,939 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 21,064 of 21,939   
   Michael Schwingen to Lawrence D'Oliveiro   
   Re: Dual wifi connections in Bookworm   
   29 Nov 24 13:07:17   
   
   INTL 3:770/1 3:770/3   
   REPLYADDR news-1513678000@discworld.dascon.de   
   REPLYTO 3:770/3.0 UUCP   
   MSGID:  37efbbd8   
   REPLY:  85321a44   
   PID: SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
   On 2024-11-28, Lawrence D'Oliveiro  wrote:   
   >> No, as far as the wireless channel and the access point are concerned,   
   >> these are two separate clients.  That they are attached to the same host   
   >> does not matter, they will cooperate / share airtime.   
   >   
   > Regardless of how you look at it, they are colliding with each other.   
      
   Yes, but CSMA/CA reduces that to a point where it works fine unless the   
   channel is heavily loaded.   
      
   > Having two interfaces on the same channel cannot magically double its   
   > bandwidth.   
      
   I never said that - of course they share the bandwidth, just like two   
   separate clients do.  Noone installs one separate access point for every   
   device they use (not only because you would run out of free channels quite   
   quick, even with 5/6GHz) - multiple devices connected to a single AP is a   
   standard, supported scenario. Even when one client does heavy up/downloads,   
   the others will notice a slowdown, but not the packet loss problems that   
   were the start of this thread.   
      
   > And because both transmitters are so close to each other, that   
   > aggravates the losses from frame collisions.   
      
   How? Being close to each other, they can easily "see" when the channel is   
   busy and will not step over each other's foot. Contrary, widely spaced clients   
   lead to the "hidden station" problem where two stations each "see" the   
   access point, but not each other, and start to transmit at the same time.   
      
   cu   
   Michael   
   --   
   Some people have no respect of age unless it is bottled.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)   
   SEEN-BY: 10/0 1 103/705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/187 129/305 153/757   
   SEEN-BY: 153/7715 218/0 1 601 700 840 870 930 220/70 221/1 6 360 226/17   
   SEEN-BY: 226/30 100 227/114 229/110 111 114 200 206 300 317 400 426   
   SEEN-BY: 229/428 470 550 616 664 700 240/1120 266/512 267/800 282/1038   
   SEEN-BY: 291/111 292/854 301/1 113 812 310/31 320/219 322/757 335/364   
   SEEN-BY: 341/66 342/200 396/45 460/58 633/280 712/848 770/1 3 100   
   SEEN-BY: 770/330 340 772/210 220 230 902/26 5020/400 1042 5075/35   
   PATH: 770/3 1 218/840 221/6 301/1 218/700 229/426   
      

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca