INTL 3:770/1 3:770/3   
   REPLYADDR bp@www.zefox.net   
   REPLYTO 3:770/3.0 UUCP   
   MSGID: cd9e3cef   
   REPLY: c087c840   
   PID: SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
   bp@www.zefox.net wrote:   
   > The Natural Philosopher wrote:   
   >>   
   >> Bob.. I dont *know* how linux routing copes with two interfaces to the   
   >> same network.   
   >>   
   >> Ideally it should open either at random, and since they have unique   
   >> source addresses pings should always get back. Nothing outside the   
   >> machine itself knows whether it has two interfaces or is in fact two   
   >> separate machines.   
   >>   
   >> I just know that my gut feeling is not to do that, at all.   
   >> When you have all these interfaces up, what does ifconfig show? and route?   
   >   
   > To start with, ifconfig reports   
   > wlan1: flags=4163 mtu 1500   
   > inet 192.168.1.18 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255   
   > inet6 fe80::26ee:3368:6e6c:aa6e prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20   
   > ether 24:2f:d0:b9:54:f7 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)   
   > RX packets 6896208 bytes 8657581257 (8.0 GiB)   
   > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0   
   > TX packets 1647035 bytes 215681086 (205.6 MiB)   
   > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0   
   > and route reports   
   > Kernel IP routing table   
   > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface   
   > default 192.168.1.254 0.0.0.0 UG 601 0 0 wlan1   
   > 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 601 0 0 wlan1   
   >   
   > If I bring up wlan0 (the internal wifi interface then ifconfig reports   
   > wlan0: flags=4163 mtu 1500   
   > inet 192.168.1.11 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255   
   > inet6 fe80::98a0:b51e:4f4:236a prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20   
   > ether 2c:cf:67:0f:10:64 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)   
   > RX packets 108 bytes 15818 (15.4 KiB)   
   > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0   
   > TX packets 1120 bytes 200215 (195.5 KiB)   
   > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0   
   >   
   > wlan1: flags=4163 mtu 1500   
   > inet 192.168.1.18 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255   
   > inet6 fe80::26ee:3368:6e6c:aa6e prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20   
   > ether 24:2f:d0:b9:54:f7 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)   
   > RX packets 6897155 bytes 8657817041 (8.0 GiB)   
   > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0   
   > TX packets 1648196 bytes 215824139 (205.8 MiB)   
   > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0   
   > and route reports   
   > Kernel IP routing table   
   > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface   
   > default 192.168.1.254 0.0.0.0 UG 601 0 0 wlan1   
   > default 192.168.1.254 0.0.0.0 UG 602 0 0 wlan0   
   > 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 601 0 0 wlan1   
   > 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 602 0 0 wlan0   
   >   
   > At the moment, there's a ping session running to the gateway continuously.   
   > Times are sub-2ms unloaded, until I start loading a big page under chromium,   
   > whereupon ping times go.....dammit, everthing works just fine 8-(   
   >   
   > At the moment I'm baffled.   
      
   It turns out that letting the system stand for ~4 hrs reproduced some   
   of the problems. Ping times with both interfaces up eventually rose to   
   7-10 ms but didn't fail completely. Several of the ssh connections   
   open from the Pi5 to other hosts either froze or disconnected.   
      
   bob prohaska   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)   
   SEEN-BY: 19/38 105/81 106/201 128/187 129/305 153/757 7715 218/700   
   SEEN-BY: 218/840 220/70 226/17 30 100 227/114 229/110 111 114 200   
   SEEN-BY: 229/206 300 317 400 426 428 470 550 616 664 700 266/512 267/800   
   SEEN-BY: 282/1038 291/111 292/854 310/31 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45   
   SEEN-BY: 460/58 633/280 281 412 418 420 509 2744 712/848 770/1 3 100   
   SEEN-BY: 770/330 340 772/210 220 230 902/26 5020/400 5075/35   
   PATH: 770/3 1 633/280 229/426   
      
|