home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   RBERRYPI      Support for the Raspberry Pi device      21,939 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 20,812 of 21,939   
   The Natural Philosopher to john larkin   
   Re: RP2040 reset idea   
   22 Sep 24 09:32:10   
   
   INTL 3:770/1 3:770/3   
   REPLYADDR tnp@invalid.invalid   
   REPLYTO 3:770/3.0 UUCP   
   MSGID:  48f6f8df   
   REPLY:  a19e3b99   
   PID: SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
   XPost: sci.electronics.design   
      
   On 21/09/2024 20:56, john larkin wrote:   
   > On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 19:50:34 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   >> john larkin  wrote:   
   >>> On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 19:29:26 +0100, The Natural Philosopher   
   >>>  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 21/09/2024 16:08, john larkin wrote:   
   >>>>> On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 09:12:06 +0100, The Natural Philosopher   
   >>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 20/09/2024 19:00, john larkin wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On 20 Sep 2024 11:30:13 +0100 (BST), Theo   
   >>>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> In comp.sys.raspberry-pi The Natural Philosopher  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> On 19/09/2024 23:09, Lasse Langwadt wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> On 9/18/24 00:33, john larkin wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> It looks like a USB memory stick. You can delete or add files if   
   you   
   >>>>>>>>>>> want.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> It boots CPU 0 (the one we call Alice) from a file with the   
   extension   
   >>>>>>>>>>> .UL2   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Why   .UL2   one wonders.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> We'll put a bunch of files into the flash. Code for Bob, the 2nd   
   CPU.   
   >>>>>>>>>>> An FPGA bitstream file. A prototype calibration table. A README   
   file   
   >>>>>>>>>>> to explain everything in plain English.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> sure it's not UF2?   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/microsoft/uf2   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Definitely uf2 here.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> And no, you cannot 'delete or add files' to it.   
   >>>>>>>>> The action of pretending to download a uf2 file into what appears to   
   be   
   >>>>>>>>> an empty drive, erases everything on it and programs the flash.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> There are no visible files to delete.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Neat.  So basically you throw some files at it, which causes a series   
   of   
   >>>>>>>> block writes.  UF2 picks out specially tagged block writes and uses   
   that to   
   >>>>>>>> program the flash.  It doesn't actually care what other stuff is   
   written to   
   >>>>>>>> the flash as it ignores all of that, so it doesn't care about all the   
   FAT   
   >>>>>>>> stuff or whatever junk your OS decides to put on there.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Means you can write any kind of files to it and it'll only pay   
   attention to   
   >>>>>>>> the specific tagged blocks.  If the OS is happy to cache the medium   
   (as many   
   >>>>>>>> do) you could maybe even reformat it as some other filesystem like   
   NTFS and   
   >>>>>>>> it would still handle writing the UF2 file correctly.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Theo   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> My Pi guy says that you can only write one file, and the act of   
   >>>>>>> writing that file wipes anything that was there before. So the flash   
   >>>>>>> probably doesn't have a file structure, and the USB memory-stick write   
   >>>>>>> is, well, a sort of cheap trick.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> That's workable, if inelegant. We can pack everything we need into   
   >>>>>>> that one big file and users can upgrade box code in the field pretty   
   >>>>>>> easily.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> It gets nastier if you want to preserve config info across reboots.   
   >>>>>> It is possible to read and write areas of flash from the code, but its   
   >>>>>> no picnic.   
   >>>>>> And it gets wiped when new code is uploaded   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> It is an area I will have to tackle for one project tho.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Yes, writing to flash from the running application is nasty.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> We have to calibrate each box. We'll store the prototype calibration   
   >>>>> table inside the big flash image. At factory test, we'll grab that,   
   >>>>> edit it for this particular unit, and save it to a small SPI eeprom   
   >>>>> chip. That costs 24 cents and one chip select pin.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> My guy says that there are a few magic integers at the start of the   
   >>>>> UF2 file that identifies it, well, as a UF2 file. That confirms that   
   >>>>> the Pico flash doesn't have a file structure, it just stores one giant   
   >>>>> chunk of stuff starting at the start.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> It's Windows who lies about it acting like a USB memory stick that   
   >>>>> stores files.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> We did consider saving the real cal table at some fixed physical   
   >>>>> address near the end of the flash , on the theory that nobody will   
   >>>>> ever write a bootable image that big. That might work.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>> That seems to be the case.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I looked into it enough to see that it would be possible to store NV   
   >>>> data in a high part of the flash.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I think that the runtime provides access to a memory location that   
   >>>> indicates the end of the uploaded flash image, so in theory flash above   
   >>>> that is free to write, with the proviso it has to be done in large   
   >>>> blocks on specific address boundaries.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> All this is at least Pi Pico specific anyway.   
   >>>   
   >>> We're using the RP2040 chip, so will have a huge flash chip. We will   
   >>> sometimes store an FPGA config file that could be too big for the 2   
   >>> MByte part on the Pico.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Will keep me busy through the dark winter days...:-)   
   >>>   
   >>> Storing anything in high flash still has the problem that you can't   
   >>> run flash-cached code while the write is going on, unless you are very   
   >>> careful.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> It’s good to have a warm relationship with your linker mapfile. ;)   
   >>   
   >> Cheers   
   >>   
   >> Phil Hobbs   
   >   
   > Interrupts might get nasty, demanding swaps into the flash cache when   
   > the flash is busy writing.   
   >   
   I think the recommended technique is to disable all those and suspend   
   any other threads that might be active or write only single threaded code   
      
   --   
   “But what a weak barrier is truth when it stands in the way of an   
   hypothesis!”   
      
   Mary Wollstonecraft   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)   
   SEEN-BY: 10/0 1 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 129/305 153/757   
   SEEN-BY: 153/7715 218/0 1 601 700 840 870 930 220/70 221/1 6 360 226/17   
   SEEN-BY: 226/30 100 227/114 229/110 111 114 200 206 300 317 400 426   
   SEEN-BY: 229/428 470 550 616 664 700 240/1120 266/512 267/800 282/1038   
   SEEN-BY: 291/111 292/854 301/1 113 812 310/31 320/219 322/757 335/364   
   SEEN-BY: 341/66 342/200 396/45 460/58 633/280 712/848 770/1 3 100   
   SEEN-BY: 770/330 340 772/210 220 230 5020/400 1042 5058/104 5075/35   
   PATH: 770/3 1 218/840 221/6 301/1 218/700 229/426   
      

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca