INTL 3:770/1 3:770/3   
   REPLYADDR steveo@eircom.net   
   REPLYTO 3:770/3.0 UUCP   
   MSGID: <20240721102238.fa3c7bfbd9207304947b0db7@eircom.net> d13dcf58   
   REPLY:  5e1ec704   
   PID: SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
   On Sun, 21 Jul 2024 09:31:03 +0100   
   The Natural Philosopher  wrote:   
      
   > On 21/07/2024 09:06, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:   
   > > On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 12:10:22 +0100, druck wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> By the time any type of storage device is reporting errors during   
   > >> actual use, it's already in a really bad way, and should have been   
   > >> replaced.   
   > >   
   > > This is why you have redundant systems. That’s how the pros do it.   
   >   
   > No. Its why you use SMART.   
   >   
   > AND redundant storage, which SSDs already have built in   
      
   	Yes but the kind of redundancy I thought of first was some kind of   
   RAID or live backup (I do both and monitor SMART) so that there isn't just   
   one copy of the data ready to be used.   
      
   --   
   Steve O'Hara-Smith   
   Odds and Ends at http://www.sohara.org/   
   For forms of government let fools contest   
   Whate're is best administered is best - Alexander Pope   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)   
   SEEN-BY: 10/0 1 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/260 129/305   
   SEEN-BY: 153/757 7715 218/0 1 601 700 840 870 930 220/70 221/1 6 360   
   SEEN-BY: 226/17 30 100 227/114 229/110 111 112 113 200 206 300 317   
   SEEN-BY: 229/400 426 428 470 550 616 664 700 240/1120 266/512 267/800   
   SEEN-BY: 282/1038 291/111 292/854 301/1 113 812 310/31 320/219 322/757   
   SEEN-BY: 335/364 341/66 342/200 396/45 460/58 633/280 712/848 770/1   
   SEEN-BY: 770/3 100 330 340 772/210 220 230 5020/400 1042 5058/104   
   SEEN-BY: 5075/35   
   PATH: 770/3 1 218/840 221/6 301/1 218/700 229/426