home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   RBERRYPI      Support for the Raspberry Pi device      21,939 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 20,074 of 21,939   
   Bob Latham to Pancho   
   Re: Google Groups   
   12 Jun 24 09:42:32   
   
   INTL 3:770/1 3:770/3   
   REPLYADDR bob@sick-of-spam.invalid   
   REPLYTO 3:770/3.0 UUCP   
   MSGID: <5b6fc2b4a2bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> e3a9440e   
   REPLY:  e751ed41   
   PID: SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
   In article ,   
      Pancho  wrote:   
   > On 11/06/2024 13:19, Bob Latham wrote:   
   > > In article ,   
   > >     Pancho  wrote:   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >> YouTuber, Susan Oliver, and her dog Cindy, deal with John Campbell in   
   > >> multiple videos:   
   > >   
   > >>    
   > >   
   > >> She also gives an interesting discussion of AstraZeneca Covid vaccine.   
   > >   
   > >>    
   > >   
   > >   
   > > Reaction as I expected. :-)   
   > >   
   > > He didn't wrte the papers or create the data.   
   > >   
      
   > There are many bad academic papers, Campbell picks them and   
   > misrepresents the results to boost his YouTube subscribers. If you   
   > watched Susan Oliver's critiques, it might become clearer to you.   
   > No one wants to watch John Campbell repeatedly telling them the   
   > pandemic is over, so he tells them some bollocks, about a vaccine   
   > conspiracy, and they continue subscribing.   
      
   Several things show up in your text. You refer to him as Campbell so   
   your opinion is biased before you start. You make no mention of peer   
   reviewed. You tell me one persons review is accurate and Dr. Campbell   
   is bollocks but that just means you like one narrative more than   
   another. You of course suggest that you opinion is fact but give no   
   evidence.   
      
   > I did learn one new pithy idea...   
      
   > Brandolini's law: The amount of energy needed to refute bullshit is   
   > an order of magnitude bigger than that needed to produce it.   
      
   Oh, I quite agree with that. Strange that you don't see it applies to   
   narrative follows the most.   
      
   Anyway believe what you will, the truth is coming out but very, very   
   slowly, many arses to cover.   
      
   Bob.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)   
   SEEN-BY: 10/0 1 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/260 129/305   
   SEEN-BY: 153/757 7715 218/0 1 601 700 840 870 930 220/70 221/1 6 360   
   SEEN-BY: 226/17 30 100 227/114 229/110 111 112 113 200 206 300 317   
   SEEN-BY: 229/400 426 428 470 550 616 664 700 240/1120 266/512 267/800   
   SEEN-BY: 282/1038 291/111 292/854 301/1 113 812 310/31 320/219 322/757   
   SEEN-BY: 335/364 341/66 342/200 396/45 460/58 633/280 712/848 770/1   
   SEEN-BY: 770/3 100 330 340 772/210 220 230 5020/400 1042 5058/104   
   SEEN-BY: 5075/35   
   PATH: 770/3 1 218/840 221/6 301/1 218/700 229/426   
      

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca