INTL 3:770/1 3:770/3   
   REPLYADDR frede@mouse-potato.com   
   REPLYTO 3:770/3.0 UUCP   
   MSGID: <7ivPN.86565$mMj7.8864@fx01.iad> dd2d2545   
   REPLY:  6d3859f0   
   PID: SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
   XPost: alt.os.linux.ubuntu, alt.os.linux.mageia   
      
   Marco Moock  writes:   
      
   > On 02.04.2024 um 22:16 Uhr William Unruh wrote:   
   >   
   >> ?? 192.168.x.x is non-routable.   
   >   
   > It is routable, but won't be routed on the internet.   
   > You can of course route it through a tunnel like here.   
      
   I always say that the RFC 1918 addresses are "not normally publicly   
   routed." :-)   
      
   As you say, they definitely _are_ routable, or a whole lot of home and   
   corporate networks would not be functional.   
      
   I saw a video not too long ago that pointed out that the use of these   
   addresses and NAT was made widespread by the Cisco PIX. It was a pretty   
   interesting look back at something new that now seems commonplace and   
   ordinary.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)   
   SEEN-BY: 10/0 1 15/0 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 128/260 129/305 135/220   
   SEEN-BY: 135/225 153/757 7715 218/0 1 601 700 840 870 930 220/70 221/1   
   SEEN-BY: 221/6 226/17 30 100 227/114 229/110 111 112 113 200 206 307   
   SEEN-BY: 229/317 400 426 428 470 550 616 664 700 240/1120 266/512   
   SEEN-BY: 267/800 282/1038 291/111 292/854 301/1 113 812 310/31 320/219   
   SEEN-BY: 322/757 335/364 341/66 342/200 396/45 460/58 633/280 712/848   
   SEEN-BY: 770/1 3 100 330 340 772/210 220 230 5020/400 1042 5058/104   
   SEEN-BY: 5075/35   
   PATH: 770/3 1 218/840 221/6 301/1 218/700 229/426