INTL 3:770/1 3:770/3
REPLYADDR dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org
REPLYTO 3:770/3.0 UUCP
MSGID: 55169fa7
REPLY: c6fe270c
PID: SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
XPost: alt.os.linux.ubuntu, alt.os.linux.mageia
On Wed, 03 Apr 2024 23:53:00 -0400, jim whitby wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 22:29:13 -0500, Grant Taylor wrote:
>
>> On 4/3/24 22:09, William Unruh wrote:
>>> But which? He says he has his home network on 192.168. and there is a
>>> work network on 192.168. but it is a different network (ne home, one
>>> work) and the work one takes precednce for him. Only one of them can be
>>> active to his machine. which has to be setup in the routng tables.
>>
>> Traditional routing, read: non-policy-based-routing, dictates that the
>> best route wins. Directly attached routes always trump remote routes.
>>
>> So for a remote route to be trumping a directly attached route,
>> policy-based-routing must be in use or something else to override very
>> low level routing / networking.
>
> Verify the netmask(s) u use. If they are all /24 then a change in local
> nwtwirk would be easiset change.
Just don't forget to change the shorewall rules.
Regards, Dave Hodgins
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
SEEN-BY: 1/19 15/0 16/0 19/37 80/1 90/1 105/81 106/201 123/130 128/260
SEEN-BY: 129/305 135/220 225 142/104 153/757 7715 203/0 218/700 840
SEEN-BY: 220/70 221/1 6 242 360 226/17 30 100 227/114 229/110 111
SEEN-BY: 229/112 113 200 206 307 317 400 426 428 470 550 616 664 700
SEEN-BY: 230/0 240/5832 266/512 267/800 280/5003 282/1038 291/111
SEEN-BY: 292/854 301/1 310/31 320/119 219 319 2119 322/757 325/304
SEEN-BY: 335/364 341/66 342/200 396/45 423/81 460/58 633/280 712/848
SEEN-BY: 770/1 3 100 330 340 772/210 220 230 5020/400 5053/58 5058/104
SEEN-BY: 5075/35
PATH: 770/3 1 218/840 221/6 1 320/219 229/426
|
