INTL 3:770/1 3:770/3   
   REPLYADDR usenet@dolik.dev   
   REPLYTO 3:770/3.0 UUCP   
   MSGID:  5e39f3e6   
   REPLY:  d3dc8138   
   PID: SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
   The Natural Philosopher  wrote:   
   > On 14/03/2024 07:57, Andriy D wrote:   
   >> This is exactly my concern - I want this think up&running 24/7/365 and I   
   don't want   
   >> it to burn my house down :)   
   >> I guess this is where you'd say 'risk' and 'price' are in a inverse   
   relationship ;)   
   >> --   
   > It is entirely possible to trickle charge a lithium cell at uber low   
   > risk, Essentially you want to current limit the supply at at one tenth   
   > of the hourly capacity so e,g a 2200mAh celll would need to be charged   
   > at no more than 220mA, and voltage limit the charge at 4.2V.   
   Majority of the schemes I've found so far suggest use of NiMH cells as   
   they are less 'combustive'. However cheap AliExpress devices do use Li-ion   
   cells. Confusing :)   
      
      
   --   
      
   Cheers,   
   \aID   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)   
   SEEN-BY: 15/0 90/1 105/81 106/201 128/260 129/305 135/225 153/757   
   SEEN-BY: 153/7715 218/700 840 220/70 226/17 30 100 227/114 229/110   
   SEEN-BY: 229/111 112 113 200 206 307 317 400 426 428 470 550 616 664   
   SEEN-BY: 229/700 266/512 267/800 282/1038 291/111 292/854 301/1 310/31   
   SEEN-BY: 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45 460/58 633/280 712/848 770/1   
   SEEN-BY: 770/3 100 330 340 772/210 220 230 5020/400 5075/35   
   PATH: 770/3 1 712/848 229/426