INTL 3:770/1 3:770/3   
   REPLYADDR bob@sick-of-spam.invalid   
   REPLYTO 3:770/3.0 UUCP   
   MSGID: <5b328a70ffbob@sick-of-spam.invalid> 28cc1d02   
   REPLY: c0ca8eb6   
   PID: SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
   In article ,   
    The Natural Philosopher wrote:   
   > On 13/02/2024 21:32, Bob Latham wrote:   
   > > Right so there is a video that shows presidents, prime ministers   
   > > doctors and professors all claiming they didn't say it stopped you   
   > > getting covid. Then the video goes on to show them all saying exactly   
   > > that.   
      
   > Again, you are confusing facts with narratives.   
      
   > And expecting politicians to tell the complicated truth, which at   
   > that point they don't even know, rather than a simple narrative   
   > they think the plebs will understand.   
      
   > You are inferring far too much from human weakness. And expecting   
   > far too much from 'experts'   
      
   > I don't know what you are actually referring too, but at leats in   
   > my personal memory all I saw was a lot of politicians in a panic,   
   > and a lot of epidemioligsts with some extremely sketchy models,   
   > all of which said (in the case of the UK), that if something   
   > wasn't done, deaths were likely to exceed 50,000, and the peak   
   > rate of the sperad would completely overwhelm the hospitals.   
      
   Of all the people to write something like that you were the last I   
   expected. I know you are aware that main stream media pushes   
   propaganda not truth, I know you are.   
      
   Surely you remember that we had professors of serious note like   
   Sunetra Gupta who were completely shut out of the conversation   
   because politicians had decided what the truth was going to be and   
   only allowed doctors who agreed with the narrative to speak. Perhaps   
   you were unaware of the group that formed of viral experts from   
   across the globe offering an alternative view which was shut out.   
      
   The models were from that well known Prof Neil Ferguson otherwise   
   know as pants down because he didn't believe his own model when it   
   came to his sexual desires and broke the rules.   
      
   This man is and was at the time notorious for massive exaggeration of   
   deaths from every virus that got near us. He had form for this kind   
   of nonsense and then some. He was always massively WRONG. But his   
   ridiculous models were very useful for the narrative.   
      
   We both know from ACC how models only reflect the opinion or desire   
   of their creator, they are propaganda tools, nothing more.   
      
   You also seem unaware that many deaths attributed to covid were   
   really from other things like the end of life drug, I'd have to look   
   the name given to many elderly in care homes. Or that ventilators   
   were in themselves the cause of deaths.   
      
      
   But congratulations. I've never seen such an expert job of air   
   brushing inconvenient truths.   
      
   Surprisingly you too seem to be a victim of the media.   
      
   No point in arguing further.   
      
   Bob.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)   
   SEEN-BY: 10/0 1 15/0 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 128/260 129/305 135/225   
   SEEN-BY: 153/757 7715 218/0 1 601 700 840 870 930 220/70 221/1 6 226/17   
   SEEN-BY: 226/30 100 227/114 229/110 112 113 200 206 307 317 400 426   
   SEEN-BY: 229/428 470 550 616 664 700 240/1120 266/512 267/800 282/1038   
   SEEN-BY: 291/111 292/854 301/1 113 812 310/31 320/219 322/757 335/364   
   SEEN-BY: 341/66 342/200 396/45 460/58 633/280 712/848 770/1 3 100   
   SEEN-BY: 770/330 340 772/210 220 230 5020/400 1042 5058/104 5075/35   
   PATH: 770/3 1 218/840 221/6 301/1 218/700 229/426   
      
|