INTL 3:770/1 3:770/3   
   REPLYADDR steveo@eircom.net   
   REPLYTO 3:770/3.0 UUCP   
   MSGID: <20240131113826.9d12d0efbc2b0052ba70dc88@eircom.net> 7c686a11   
   REPLY:  14fb00b7   
   PID: SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
   On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 11:29:44 +0000   
   Richard Kettlewell  wrote:   
      
   > There are things you can do about this (screen lock, full disk   
      
   	Screen lock really should be a minimum consideration. Easy to do   
   and good enough for most purposes, fingerprint unlock is convenient if   
   available.   
      
   > encryption, etc) but your choices may depend on the nature of the   
   > threat. e.g. a dishonest cleaner could be deterred by a screen lock, but   
   > an abusive partner might respond with violence to any visible security   
   > measures.   
      
   	Things are serious when the threat surface includes your skin!   
      
   --   
   Steve O'Hara-Smith   
   Odds and Ends at http://www.sohara.org/   
   For forms of government let fools contest   
   Whate're is best administered is best - Alexander Pope   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)   
   SEEN-BY: 10/0 1 15/0 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 128/260 129/305 135/225   
   SEEN-BY: 153/757 7715 218/0 1 601 700 840 870 930 220/70 221/1 6 226/17   
   SEEN-BY: 226/30 100 227/114 229/110 112 113 200 206 307 317 400 426   
   SEEN-BY: 229/428 470 550 616 664 700 240/1120 266/512 267/800 282/1038   
   SEEN-BY: 291/111 292/854 301/1 113 812 310/31 320/219 322/757 335/364   
   SEEN-BY: 341/66 342/200 396/45 460/58 633/280 712/848 770/1 3 100   
   SEEN-BY: 770/330 340 772/210 220 230 5020/400 1042 5058/104 5075/35   
   PATH: 770/3 1 218/840 221/6 301/1 218/700 229/426