INTL 3:770/1 3:770/3
REPLYADDR cl@isbd.net
REPLYTO 3:770/3.0 UUCP
MSGID: <9nhk8k-333l1.ln1@esprimo.zbmc.eu> 8ea26f63
REPLY: de27aaf1
PID: SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> On 29/01/2024 04:54, 68g.1499 wrote:
> > North Korea is not
> > going to spend five days worth of CPU time to crack your
> > little home Pi and its valuable horde of "Rick and Morty"
> > vids. Your home connection is likely too slow to be very
> > useful for launching broadscale attacks on other systems
> > as well.
>
> Indeed. I've two servers on the open internet with open ssh ports . In 8
> years although there is a constant stream of login attempts no one has
> guessed the correct user name - let alone the password.
>
> People get paranoid about stuff they think they know about and forget
> the simple things.
> A long but easily memorable string like my.cat.hates.PIZZA! will
> probably fall to a dictionary attack in a few thousand hours, but
> really, who cares?
>
I've never understood how this can work. If you type a wrong password
to ssh it will wait several seconds before allowing you to try again.
In addition it will throw you off completely after three failures and
you'd have to start all over. This is default ssh, no fail2ban or
anything like that.
So how can a dictionary attack possibly work? It would take years!
--
Chris Green
·
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
SEEN-BY: 10/0 1 15/0 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 128/260 129/305 135/225
SEEN-BY: 153/757 7715 218/0 1 601 700 840 870 930 220/70 221/1 6 226/17
SEEN-BY: 226/30 100 227/114 229/110 112 113 200 206 307 317 400 426
SEEN-BY: 229/428 470 550 616 664 700 240/1120 266/512 267/800 282/1038
SEEN-BY: 291/111 292/854 301/1 113 812 310/31 320/219 322/757 335/364
SEEN-BY: 341/66 342/200 396/45 460/58 633/280 712/848 770/1 3 100
SEEN-BY: 770/330 340 772/210 220 230 5020/400 1042 5058/104 5075/35
PATH: 770/3 1 218/840 221/6 301/1 218/700 229/426
|
