home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   RBERRYPI      Support for the Raspberry Pi device      21,939 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 18,960 of 21,939   
   The Natural Philosopher to Pancho   
   Re: Arrggh! beware the upgrade...   
   31 Dec 23 12:09:10   
   
   INTL 3:770/1 3:770/3   
   REPLYADDR tnp@invalid.invalid   
   REPLYTO 3:770/3.0 UUCP   
   MSGID:  f8074617   
   REPLY:  583bd781   
   PID: SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
   On 31/12/2023 11:35, Pancho wrote:   
   > On 31/12/2023 09:59, Ahem A Rivet's Shot wrote:   
   >> On Sun, 31 Dec 2023 08:28:28 +0000   
   >> The Natural Philosopher  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> The problem was really that C was *so* good, that people did start to   
   >>> write hugely complex stuff in it, and using people who wouldn't know a   
   >>> register or a stack pointer if it poked them in the eye or how DMA   
   >>> worked...to write them.   
   >>   
   >>     There were two other factors in the rise of C. You could get a C   
   >> compiler for just about anything, importantly there were several for   
   >> CP/M.   
   >> There weren't many decent languages that were that widely available. Also   
   >> almost every university CS course used it from very early on (Cambridge   
   >> being the notable exception because Martin Richards was there) so from   
   >> around 1980 there were a *lot* of people trained in C.   
   >>   
   >   
   > I thought university CS courses of the era avoided C and preferred more   
   > academic, pedagogical languages: Pascal, Prolog, Smalltalk, ML, Lisp.   
   >   
   Compscis had their head in the clouds and their noses stuck up their   
   arses. We learnt how to code without any 'courses'   
      
   > The benefit of C was that it was closer to assembler and suited the low   
   > power CPUs of the time, when programmers needed to think close to the   
   > metal in order to achieve acceptable performance.   
   >   
   > On the job, C was easy to learn and the 'C Programming Language' was a   
   > very good manual.   
   >   
   all that   
      
   > I was taught both OO and functional programming before I ever met C at   
   > work, which may be why I was positive about OO-Design, C++ when it came   
   > along.   
   >   
   > To this day I still prefer my brackets (C, C++, C#) in Pascal style   
   > rather than K&R, which I begrudgingly use with Java.   
      
   I think I do too.   
      
   Did pascal have curlies?   
      
   I had a friend with an Apple II and he said he couldnt code in C because   
   it had no curlies...on the kee bored   
      
   --   
   The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to   
   rule.   
   – H. L. Mencken, American journalist, 1880-1956   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)   
   SEEN-BY: 15/0 90/1 105/81 106/201 128/260 129/305 135/225 153/757   
   SEEN-BY: 153/7715 218/700 840 220/70 221/1 6 242 360 226/17 30 100   
   SEEN-BY: 227/114 229/110 112 113 200 206 307 317 400 426 428 452 470   
   SEEN-BY: 229/550 616 664 700 230/0 266/512 267/800 280/5003 282/1038   
   SEEN-BY: 291/111 292/854 8125 301/1 310/31 320/219 322/757 335/364   
   SEEN-BY: 341/66 342/200 396/45 410/9 423/81 460/58 633/280 712/848   
   SEEN-BY: 770/1 3 100 330 340 772/210 220 230 5020/400 5058/104 5075/35   
   PATH: 770/3 1 218/840 221/6 1 292/854 229/426   
      

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca