home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   RBERRYPI      Support for the Raspberry Pi device      21,939 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 18,951 of 21,939   
   56g.1183 to Theo   
   Re: "Philosopher" - Found "Brownie" Cam    
   31 Dec 23 00:47:37   
   
   INTL 3:770/1 3:770/3   
   REPLYADDR 56g.1183@ztq4.net   
   REPLYTO 3:770/3.0 UUCP   
   MSGID:  39560e95   
   REPLY:  1b3106ac   
   PID: SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
   On 12/30/23 9:01 AM, Theo wrote:   
   > Ahem A Rivet's Shot  wrote:   
   >> On Fri, 29 Dec 2023 23:46:17 -0500   
   >> "56g.1183" <56g.1183@ztq4.net> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> Hmm ... could stuff a H-Blad sensor in there, make   
   >>> a $5000 "Brownie"  :-)   
   >>   
   >>          Take one out of a rather cheaper camera perhaps or use a phone   
   >> spare part.   
   >   
   > Raspberry Pi camera, of course!  But you may find the sensor a little small   
   > for a full 35mm frame. Would be fun to see what happened though.   
   >   
   > Theo   
   >   
      
      "Brownies" were 6x6 ... not 35mm. In theory you'd   
      want a 6x6 sensor, LOTS of pixels, though the LENS   
      isn't THAT great. 6x6 with a GOOD lens is usually   
      pretty spectacular.   
      
      I have a Pentax 6x7 - "The Big One" - like a giant   
      SLR. Alas they never made a 6x7 sensor for it.   
      Modern 'tiny' sensors with theoretically similar   
      pixel counts still just don't reproduce the look   
      and feel of 'real' 6x7 medium-format film alas.   
      Modern sensors are "sharp", but film had a better   
      'tonal' range.   
      
      It's the old 'analog'-vs-'digital' arg. Digital is   
      technically 'more accurate'. 'Analog' however is   
      often more 'aesthetic' - better tuned to human   
      senses. Digital sound is technically more accurate,   
      but tube amplifiers/vinyl are more aesthetic. Similar   
      with image sensors -vs- film. Using film you get   
      basically 16+ bit tonal range ... and it's not   
      quite "linear", but more in tune with how the   
      human eye sees things. A medium/large format   
      film, say Plus-X, just LOOKS better, more "real".   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)   
   SEEN-BY: 15/0 90/1 105/81 106/201 128/260 129/305 135/225 153/757   
   SEEN-BY: 153/7715 218/700 840 220/70 221/1 6 242 360 226/17 30 100   
   SEEN-BY: 227/114 229/110 112 113 200 206 307 317 400 426 428 452 470   
   SEEN-BY: 229/550 616 664 700 230/0 266/512 267/800 280/5003 282/1038   
   SEEN-BY: 291/111 292/854 8125 301/1 310/31 320/219 322/757 335/364   
   SEEN-BY: 341/66 342/200 396/45 410/9 423/81 460/58 633/280 712/848   
   SEEN-BY: 770/1 3 100 330 340 772/210 220 230 5020/400 5058/104 5075/35   
   PATH: 770/3 1 218/840 221/6 1 292/854 229/426   
      

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca