Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    RA_SUPPORT    |    RemoteAccess Support Echo    |    677 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 512 of 677    |
|    Dran Draggore to mark lewis    |
|    RAMSG purging on 2.02    |
|    12 Apr 16 06:33:42    |
       Re: RAMSG purging on 2.02        By: mark lewis to Dran Draggore on Mon Apr 11 2016 10:07 am               DD>> I'm currently using RemoteAccess 2.02.               ML> why?              It was the first version I ever used.               DD>> RAMSG 2.50.b4        DD>> =============               DD>> * When purging messages in the Hudson message base by date, RAMSG         ML> will        DD>> now treat dates where the year is smaller than 80 to be in the        DD>> 21st        DD>> century (20xx).               DD>> Does this mean that older versions of RAMSG will delete messages        DD>> created         ML> in        DD>> 2016 ?               ML> are you using the HMB?              I plan on using HMB for local message areas. And JAM for echoes. I think this       adds authenticity to the deployment. I've already created 200 unfilled areas       since the documentation says Hudson can only use 200. Heh.              I could just experiment but since I'm still reading the documentation, I        thought I'd get an answer in advance; and check out the RA_SUPPORT echo, which       is apparently bustling with activity.       --- SBBSecho 2.33-Linux        * Origin: (1:218/215)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca