From: calvin@remove.daxack.ca   
      
   Adam H. Kerman (ahk@chinet.com) said...   
   >   
   >To repeat myself for the monstrously oblivious, that has nothing to do   
   >with distracted driving, the topic under discussion.   
      
   QED: This proves why Adam H. Kerman does not get it. The topic under   
   discussion was NOT distracted driving. It was how the telephone has   
   changed the way people act with it in ways they don't do with face-to-face   
   communication. I used distracted driving as an extension to that premise,   
   because it is ANOTHER way people act when a telephone is thrown in.   
      
   Adam H. Kerman needs to learn to read to understand. Follow what is being   
   said and stop making it up as you go along.   
      
   --   
   Calvin Henry-Cotnam   
   "Unusual or extreme reactions to events caused by negligence   
    are imaginable, but not reasonably foreseeable"   
     - Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin, May 2008   
      
   --- SoupGate/W32 v1.03   
    * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1)