From: heller@deepsoft.com
At Tue, 1 Jul 2014 17:49:37 +0000 (UTC) "Adam H. Kerman"
wrote:
>
> conklin wrote:
> >"Adam H. Kerman" wrote:
> >>conklin wrote:
>
> >>>The rural coopertives do better. SkyBest in the Boone, NC area, has
> >>>put in FIOS at my cabin, a place with such a view that only one house
> >>>is visible, and that is in the distance. . . .
>
> >>Yes, George. Must be lovely to have other people pay for your
> >>infrastructure.
>
> >You never know anything except how to be nasty.
>
> Sorry you think the truth is nasty, but the ratepayers belonging to that
> rural cooperative are NOT the ones paying for your infrastructure. That
> would be paid for by a surcharge on fees on everyone else's phone bills
> elsewhere in the country.
>
> Do you really believe there's a business case for building a fiber plant in
> a rural area?
Actually there is. Just not a business case that the likes of Verizon would
buy into. The deal is that since *municiple cooperatives* don't have to make
a ROI or profit in a year (or less), they can afford to get 20 year bonds and
spend 20 years paying down the capital costs of the infrastructure. That is,
the business model that works involves a 20 year investment time frame. The
private telecom sector can/will only operate on a 1-2 year investment time
frame. This is no different that rural electrification (or rural phone
service). If it was not for *municiple cooperatives*, rural America would
*still* be without electricity or phone service. As it is, rural America
generally has crappy phone service and America's electrical grid is aging
(badly).
Checkout http://www.wiredwest.net/ for more information.
>
--
Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 / heller@deepsoft.com
Deepwoods Software -- http://www.deepsoft.com/
() ascii ribbon campaign -- against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org -- against proprietary attachments
--- SoupGate/W32 v1.03
* Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1)
|
