From: stephen@sprunk.org   
      
   On 20-Jun-14 14:10, Adam H. Kerman wrote:   
   > Stephen Sprunk wrote:   
   >> On 20-Jun-14 10:32, Adam H. Kerman wrote:   
   >>> hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:   
   >   
   >>>> Two 1950s-era Phila area expwys were originally built with   
   >>>> very short entrance ramps. One still has them, but its traffic   
   >>>> volume is light, so entering isn't difficult. The other expy   
   >>>> carried much higher traffic volumes and had a high fatality   
   >>>> rate. That road was finally rebuilt with much better ramps.   
   >   
   >>> This is off-the-wall stupid. Why not greatly reduce the speed   
   >>> limit? Then, short entrance ramps aren't a problem at all.   
   >   
   >> That would penalize the through traffic _not_ using each ramp,   
   >> which is probably the vast majority in most cases.   
   >   
   > 'Cuz the highway was never designed for those speeds, duh. What's   
   > the matter with you?   
      
   The through lanes _were_ designed for higher speeds, so why should the   
   traffic in the through lanes be penalized just because the ramps were   
   not designed for the same speeds?   
      
   S   
      
   --   
   Stephen Sprunk "God does not play dice." --Albert Einstein   
   CCIE #3723 "God is an inveterate gambler, and He throws the   
   K5SSS dice at every possible opportunity." --Stephen Hawking   
      
   --- SoupGate/W32 v1.03   
    * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1)   
|