home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   RAILFAN      Trains, model railroading hobby      3,261 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 617 of 3,261   
   Glen Labah to Stephen Sprunk   
   Re: safety improvements why not for oil    
   19 Jun 14 23:12:06   
   
   From: gl4317@yahoo.com   
      
   In article ,   
    Stephen Sprunk  wrote:   
      
   > On 19-Jun-14 01:59, Glen Labah wrote:   
   > > There are other countries out there that have fewer derailments than   
   > > the USA.  It seems to me it might be worth taking a look at some of   
   > > those countries to see what they are doing that is different.   
   >   
   > For one thing, they're using significantly lighter rolling stock, which   
   > lowers the risk of derailment due to excessive speed or poor track.   
   >   
   > The FRA weight penalty strikes again...   
      
      
   I would think that the frequency and required detailed nature of the   
   track inspections would play a significant role.  I read somewhere, and   
   I don't remember where I saw it, that the derailment rate per million of   
   ton-miles is actually better in Russia than in some western European   
   countries.  Their operations are a little more like the USA in terms of   
   long heavy freight trains.   
      
   IF it is true, it would be interesting to see what they are doing   
   different than everyone else when it comes to their track inspection   
   technology.   
      
   --   
   Please note this e-mail address is a pit of spam due to e-mail address   
   harvesters on Usenet. Response time to e-mail sent here is slow.   
      
   --- SoupGate/W32 v1.03   
    * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca