From: ahk@chinet.com   
      
   Stephen Sprunk  wrote:   
   >On 09-Jun-14 14:30, Jishnu Mukerji wrote:   
      
   >>Absolutely! PATH should have not only been extended to the airport   
   >>but when the new Terminals A, B, C were designed they should have   
   >>made accommodation for such future construction. ...   
      
   >We already had a long thread about what _should_ have been done at EWR a   
   >few months ago; why not just refer readers back to that rather than   
   >rehashing the entire thing again?   
      
   Everything said on Usenet has been said before, Stephen.   
      
   --- SoupGate/W32 v1.03   
    * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1)