From: johnl@iecc.com   
      
   >Absolutely! PATH should have not only been extended to the airport but   
   >when the new Terminals A, B, C were designed they should have made   
   >accommodation for such future construction. But the PANYNJ Project   
   >Managers were dead set against any rail connection to EWR, and specially   
   >PATH. So they actually went out of their way to design the terminals to   
   >make it very difficult to bring PATH to the terminals. (This is now for   
   >a fact from someone who was part of the team that was given explicit   
   >directions to design such that it is hard to add rail connection later).   
      
   I was under the impression that the space in the terminals that the   
   Airtrain uses was intended for PATH.  It looks to be about the right   
   size.   
      
   --   
   Regards,   
   John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",   
   Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly   
      
   --- SoupGate/W32 v1.03   
    * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1)