On Monday, June 9, 2014 3:30:17 PM UTC-4, Jishnu Mukerji wrote:   
      
   > Absolutely! PATH should have not only been extended to the airport but   
   > when the new Terminals A, B, C were designed they should have made   
   > accommodation for such future construction. But the PANYNJ Project   
   > Managers were dead set against any rail connection to EWR, and specially   
   > PATH. So they actually went out of their way to design the terminals to   
   > make it very difficult to bring PATH to the terminals. (This is now for   
   > a fact from someone who was part of the team that was given explicit   
   > directions to design such that it is hard to add rail connection later).   
   > This whole frickin' disaster of transportation to EWR is entirely a   
   > creation of PANYNJ architects for reasons that are hard to fathom.   
   > Shades of Robert Moses survived in PANYNJ perhaps? Who knows?   
      
   When the plans were first proposed, did anyone ever ask (and press the issue)   
   the Port Authority why they didn't choose a more desirable approach?   
      
   --- SoupGate/W32 v1.03   
    * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1)