Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    RAILFAN    |    Trains, model railroading hobby    |    3,261 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 454 of 3,261    |
|    Jishnu Mukerji to rcp27g@gmail.com    |
|    Re: E units and Talgos    |
|    04 Jun 14 07:57:38    |
      From: jishnu@nospam.verizon.net              On 6/4/2014 5:20 AM, rcp27g@gmail.com wrote:       > On Wednesday, 4 June 2014 04:16:20 UTC+2, Clark F Morris wrote:       >       >> Because the E units have 6 axles, the individual axle load should be       >> less and it would be interesting to compare centers of gravity.       >       > The E series does not have a particularly light axle load, because although       it has 6 axles, it is a heavyweight machine. An E9 has 2400 hp, weighs 140       tonnes and rides on 6 axles, giving an axle load of 23.3 tonnes. An HST power       car (1970s design)        has 2250 hp, weighs 70 tonnes and rides on 4 axles, giving an axle load of       17.5 tonnes.       >       > The real question is why modern locomotives end up so heavy. I expect part       of it is that FRA requirements lead to the need for a much heavier structure,       and part of it is that the customers don't bother specifying a lightweight       locmotive, so they get        what they ask for.       >       > Robin       >              But a vanilla Vectron in Europe has an axle load over 22.5 t. So it is       not like it is a pure American phenomenon. No FRA in Europe.              --- SoupGate/W32 v1.03        * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca