From: ahk@chinet.com   
      
   Adam H. Kerman  wrote:   
   >Stephen Sprunk  wrote:   
   >>On 22-May-14 13:44, Adam H. Kerman wrote:   
   >>>Stephen Sprunk  wrote:   
      
   >>>>I suspect we'll see that come up first in a follow-on to   
   >>>>McDonald/Heller regarding carry permits, given the leanings of the   
   >>>>current court.   
      
   >>>That's NOT what the "full faith and credit" clause means. A state   
   >>>license NEVER gives one privileges in a foreign state; that's beyond   
   >>>the state's jurisdiction. If licenses are valid in foreign states,   
   >>>it's due to a voluntary compact between the two states, which is the   
   >>>only reason why one's driver's license and vehicle registration is   
   >>>valid in a foreign state and Canadian provinces.   
      
   >>States are required to give full faith and credit to each others' legal   
   >>instruments, whether drivers licenses or warrants.   
      
   >You're completely and utterly wrong, dude. And warrants are under a   
   >different provision, the "judicial proceedings" provision of that sentence.   
   >Licenses are not included. Marriage CERTIFICATES (and birth and death vital   
   >records) fall under the "records" provision. A business or professional   
   >license isn't accepted in a foreign state unless accepted by the foreign   
   >state voluntarily, not under the constitution.   
      
   >>There is an interstate compact on handling _citations_, but not the   
   >>licenses themselves.   
      
   >Fair enough. I looked at the Driver's Licensing Law in my state's Vehicle   
   >Code. Acceptance of valid foreign licenses is found there. It's voluntary.   
      
   Now that I think about it, the Privileges and Immunities clause (or the   
   weird OR Immunities clause in the 14th Amendment) may be applicable to   
   foreign state's acceptance of driver's licenses.   
      
   --- SoupGate/W32 v1.03   
    * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1)