Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    RAILFAN    |    Trains, model railroading hobby    |    3,261 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,063 of 3,261    |
|    hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com to Michael Finfer    |
|    Re: Hoosier State crisis averted    |
|    18 Apr 15 10:08:10    |
      On Friday, April 17, 2015 at 10:02:22 PM UTC-4, Michael Finfer wrote:                     [CSX/SEPTA West Trenton line separation]       > At least separating the freights onto their own single track railroad        > will benefit the passenger operation.              I doubt it.              First, I heard gossip that the freights will run on the north side (on the new       track now being built), even though the freight track comes up from the south       side. _If_ this is true, there will be contention as the freights cross over       the psgr tracks.        Hopefully, they'll keep freights on the south side, though this will mean the       extra cost of adding catenary for the new third track.              Secondly, I think the third track will end short (west) of the Yardley       station. The bridges over Main St, River Road and the Delaware River in       Yardley will not be widened for a third track. So, freights will still share       the trackage between Yardley and        West Trenton, including the two stations, and that presents opportunities for       contention.               In any event, there will remain contention with movements in and out of the       SEPTA yard at West Trenton.              I also heard gossip--and I really hope this is false--that from Yardley to       West Trenton the two tracks will be split--one for SEPTA, one for CSX. This       will adversely impact operations in the rush hour, especially when trains run       late. In addition, if        true, it will reduce scheduling flexibility. Right now, many weekday trains       pass each other near Yardley.              SEPTA communications* do not lead to passenger confidence. There are plenty       of times that passengers are directed by loudspeaker to cross to the other       platform, only to discover the train arrives on its regular track, and they       must go back. Other times        there is no announcement and the train arrives on the wrong track, forcing       passengers to rush hour. In both cases the train is delayed and passengers       are unnecessarily inconvenienced and stressed.              Would anyone know if actual plans have been published anywhere? AFAIK, they       never bothered to hold public hearings on this project and no plans have been       released.                     * NJ Transit communications aren't any more reliable. At Princeton Jct, they       announce trains are delayed when they are on-time, and fail to announce       delayed trains or the degree of delay. Sometimes an inbound train will fail       to wait for passengers        coming up the steps from the Dinky shuttle (the Dinky apparently is not       operationally coordinated with the maineline; I guess radios are beyond       them). In Penn Central days, the ticket agent could telephone someone and       find out train status, today,        ticket agents refuse to do so.               --- SoupGate/W32 v1.03        * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca