|    RAILFAN    |    Trains, model railroading hobby    |    3,261 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,005 of 3,261    |
|    Adam H. Kerman to Peter Schleifer    |
|    Re: Lac Megantic -- my thoughts...    |
|    24 Aug 14 14:15:40    |
   
   From: ahk@chinet.com   
      
   Peter Schleifer wrote:   
   >"Adam H. Kerman" wrote:   
   >>Stephen Sprunk wrote:   
   >>>On 22-Aug-14 15:45, Adam H. Kerman wrote:   
      
   >>>>A hiring bonus is to compensate for work about to be performed   
      
   >>>No,   
      
   >>Yes.   
      
   >No.   
      
   >A hiring bonus is offered because it is needed to hire the desired   
   >person. In my own experience part of that is the need to compensate   
   >for the loss of the expected year-end bonus at the prior job if the   
   >new hire is being enticed to leave the old job before collecting that   
   >bonus.   
      
   You're being ridiculous. The new employer pays a hiring bonus anticipating   
   getting work from the new employee. There's no other way to look at it.   
   That's why it's ordinary compensation.   
      
   Golden parachute: No more work will be performed.   
      
   --- SoupGate/W32 v1.03   
    * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1)   
|
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca