Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    RAILFAN    |    Trains, model railroading hobby    |    3,261 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 290 of 3,261    |
|    hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com to Stephen Sprunk    |
|    Re: Old railway stations    |
|    11 May 14 15:50:54    |
      On Saturday, May 10, 2014 11:06:19 AM UTC-4, Stephen Sprunk wrote:              > What, you don't think any of the above cities have poor parts of town with       frequent vandalism, violent crime, etc.? Hint: they do. So, where there are       such security problems, you apply more security. But that has little to do       with fare collection per        se.               Actually, it does. Usually, communities with a better social fabric have less       vandalism, security issues, and fare evasion than troubled communities.              Also, in some communities, the transit carrier is seen as part of the       "oppressive dictatorship", and some people actually go around urging others to       evade fares and even publicize techniques to do so. (Some of these elements       are leftover hippies from        the 1960s, but they'll still out there doing their thing. Some of them are       members of city council or 'consumer advocates', fighting the transit       authority every step of the way. Such is life in the big city, or perhaps       more accurately, dying big cities.       )              I can't help but suspect that a homeless person or beggar on DART will not be       treated as kindly by the carrier, cops, or courts, as say one in       Philadelphia. I can't help but suspect that the courts in Dallas take a       different stance on the rights of "       free speech" than they do in the northeast US. That all plays a difference on       the platform of a transit line.              > Perhaps not consciously, but they [criminals] do make a risk/reward decision       on some level, and being poor just means that they assign a different value to       each factor than you or I would. So, you tilt the factors to compensate:       increase the risk and        reduce the award as _they_ see it.               Actually, no they don't think. Petty criminals are not very bright, nor think       very much. It's want-take-have. You would be amazed at the stupid stuff they       do. These folks might be told a fare inspector is coming but they'll still       jump on without a        ticket. (Some of these people probably shouldn't be out on their own, but       that's a separate issue.)              For instance, real estate agents in poor neighborhoods have to collect the       rent weekly in person in cash--if they wait until the end of the month, the       tenants won't have the money. Sometimes even weekly the agent has to come       back a few days later.              --- SoupGate/W32 v1.03        * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca