From: ahk@chinet.com
Nobody wrote:
>"Adam H. Kerman" wrote:
>>Nobody wrote:
>>>"Adam H. Kerman" wrote:
>>>>Wayne Hines wrote:
>>>>>http://www.tsb.gc.ca/eng/medias-media/avis-advisory/rail/20
4/r13d0054-20140805.asp
>>>>Still waiting for evidence the prosecutor will present in support of his
>>>>theory of criminal liability against the three men, or does Quebec simply
>>>>not have public prosecutions any more?
>>>Most criminal charges across the various provincial/territorial
>>>juridsdictoins in Canada come under the Crown Attorneys' Office... in
>>>Quebec, the Director of Public Prosecutions.
>>Yes, I know.
>Then why did you ask, "... or does Quebec simply not have public
>prosecutions any more?"
You're an idiot. You have no actual knowledge, and you've offered
nothing at all helpful. I know the name of the prosecutor's office. What
I don't know is why the basis for the incredibly high charges is such a
closely-held secret, if there's nothing political about the charges.
>>>Wonkypedia might help you:
>>Uh, no, that was useless.
>>>You're not going to see/hear publicly about evidence till the trial or
>>>trials.
>>Is there no preliminary hearing in Quebec in which the prosecution must
>>lay out his case?
>As has been outlined in that newspaper report, the next step in the
>process is the court appearance in September. Follow it, and
>appeciate that Canada's legal system is not American.
State courts in the United States uses a legal system based on the English
legal system. What's Canada's based on, Somalia's? I found a Web page
of a criminal attorney in Toronto that refers to preliminary hearings,
but for all I know, Quebec has exceptional procedures.
--- SoupGate/W32 v1.03
* Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1)
|
