From: ahk@chinet.com   
      
   conklin  wrote:   
   >   
   >"Nick Fotis"  wrote in message   
   >news:lldvvg$kpo$1@news.ntua.gr...   
   >> On 19/05/2014 19:28, Larry Sheldon wrote:   
   >>> On 5/18/2014 10:48 PM, dpeltier@my-deja.com wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>> Because a.) the slack action at the end of a 100-car freight trains is   
   >>>> not   
   >>>> safe for occupied passenger cars, and ...[snip]   
   >>>   
   >>> How did the conductor and brakeman (-men) survive in the way cars?   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> with much slower acceleration and braking, I guess.   
   >> If each coupler has a slack of one inch, in 100 cars the accumulated slack   
   >> (and acceleration/deceleration) can be rather severe, if you are not very   
   >> careful.   
   >>   
   >> N.F.   
   >   
   >If the lack in a freight train is so severe that it would harm a human in   
   >the last car, then think of the shock done to the oil.  No wonder they   
   >derail.   
      
   Is this like "bruising the gin" when the martini is made by an   
   untalented bartender, George?   
      
   --- SoupGate/W32 v1.03   
    * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1)