home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   RAILFAN      Trains, model railroading hobby      3,261 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 2,684 of 3,261   
   conklin to All   
   Re: safety improvements why not for oil    
   16 May 14 19:08:16   
   
   From: nilknocgeo@earthlink.net   
      
    wrote in message   
   news:390155590421969985.701571dpeltier-my-deja.com@news.aioe.org...   
   > "conklin"  wrote:   
   >>  wrote in message   
   >> news:4992f897-fa17-41c7-b650-e1b6c2448af6@googlegroups.com...   
   >>> http://www.mta.info/news/2014/05/15/metro-north-announces-sw   
   eping-series-safety-reforms   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> Automated Track Inspection: Metro-North has developed a comprehensive   
   >> automated track inspection plan. This plan includes the use of track   
   >> geometry measurements, machine vision track inspection, and rail internal   
   >> defect testing. These efforts will augment the visual inspections   
   >> conducted   
   >> by the railroad. Metro-North is purchasing an autonomous track monitoring   
   >> system to be mounted on passenger rail cars, to provide continuous   
   >> information about the condition of the right-of-way. The railroad will   
   >> also   
   >> obtain a dedicated track geometry vehicle.   
   >   
   > So... they're going to catch up to where the Class 1 railroads have been   
   > for a decade or so?   
   >   
   >>   
   >> This is what is needed for those 120 car oil trains.  They need a sensors   
   >> on   
   >> every oil train   
   >   
   > I'll bet you $100 that the Metro North autonomous system not be installed   
   > on every train; that they will be put on a only a few cars; that they will   
   > not actually measure the track but will actually be accelerometers to   
   > measure "ride quality"; and, In general will work exactly the same (and   
   > probably be bought from the same vendor) as the ones currently installed   
   > on   
   > dozens if not hundreds of freight locomotives.   
   >   
   > Dan   
      
   And how many?  Do the RRs pay any attention to the results, or do they just   
   say "let them bump along?"  Obviously even Amtrak's NY-DC track is quite   
   rough in places.  Enough to knock the food off the dining car tables.   
   Imagine an oil tanker being roughed up like that and the mangement saying   
   ok.  And you can't tell me that track conditions at Lac-Megantic had nothing   
   to do with the accident.  If the track were in top-notch condition, would   
   not the train have rolled through town?  Could have.  It is easy to arrest   
   the engineer, who was asleep in a motel, then to look at conditons managed   
   by a third-tier short line.   
      
   --- SoupGate/W32 v1.03   
    * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca