Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    RAILFAN    |    Trains, model railroading hobby    |    3,261 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,677 of 3,261    |
|    John Levine to All    |
|    Re: legal esoterica, was Old railway sta    |
|    16 May 14 13:21:00    |
      From: johnl@iecc.com              >I can't recall having seen any citations of English cases after 1776,       >and I'm pretty sure I'd remember that because I'd recall questioning the       >legal authority of such a precedent.              In the 1800s the Court cited English law all the time. See, for       example, the patent case Pennock & Sellers v. Dialogue - 27 U.S. 1       (1829), where Justice Story discussed the Statute of Monopolies as the       legislative antecedent of US patent law, and cites Wood v. Zimmer, 1       Holt's N.P. 58.              You can find a copy of the case here:              http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/27/1/case.html              I see from googling around that Jefferson hated the idea of using       English law as US precedent, but as so often happened, the country       went in a different direction.              R's,       John       --       Regards,       John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",       Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly              --- SoupGate/W32 v1.03        * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca