Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    RAILFAN    |    Trains, model railroading hobby    |    3,261 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,675 of 3,261    |
|    Stephen Sprunk to John Levine    |
|    Re: legal esoterica, was Old railway sta    |
|    16 May 14 17:34:06    |
      From: stephen@sprunk.org              On 16-May-14 08:21, John Levine wrote:       >> I can't recall having seen any citations of English cases after       >> 1776, and I'm pretty sure I'd remember that because I'd recall       >> questioning the legal authority of such a precedent.       >       > In the 1800s the Court cited English law all the time. See, for       > example, the patent case Pennock & Sellers v. Dialogue - 27 U.S. 1       > (1829), where Justice Story discussed the Statute of Monopolies as       > the legislative antecedent of US patent law, and cites Wood v.       > Zimmer, 1 Holt's N.P. 58.              The important detail is that Wood v. Zimmer was in 1818, well after US       independence. I was unaware of that example; thanks!              S              --       Stephen Sprunk "God does not play dice." --Albert Einstein       CCIE #3723 "God is an inveterate gambler, and He throws the       K5SSS dice at every possible opportunity." --Stephen Hawking              --- SoupGate/W32 v1.03        * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca