Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    RAILFAN    |    Trains, model railroading hobby    |    3,261 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,518 of 3,261    |
|    bob to hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com    |
|    Re: Atomic powered trains    |
|    14 Apr 14 20:17:26    |
      From: rcp27g@gmail.com              On 2014-04-14 14:41:59 +0000, hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com said:              > On Monday, April 14, 2014 7:07:47 AM UTC-4, rcp...@gmail.com wrote:       >       >> The problem is nuclear reactors are very slow to change their output.       >> The rate at which demand changes is far more rapid than the rate at       >> which power station type nuclear reactors can respond.       > Slower than coal?              Yes, significantly.              > A large coal plant takes a long time to ramp up or ramp down. Usually       > demand, averaged out over the grid by many consumers, changes gradually       > and predictively. Utilities watch consumption and various factors,       > such as weather, external events, etc., that might impact demand.              The issue with nuclear plant is that the rate of heat output from the       reactor takes a long time to vary. With thermal plant, the heat from       combustion can vary as fast as it takes to increase or decrease the       fuel and air supply rates. In reality the rate of change has to be       moderated because the structural parts of the plant exposed to high       temperatures are limited in the thermal transients they can sustain       without mechanical failure.              For nuclear plant, it takes a long time for the rate of heat output       from the reactor to respond to changes in control parameters. While it       varies depending on reactor design, the kinds of timescales involved in       ramping up and down power are measured in tens of hours. This is far       longer than the timescales of demand change from the power grid.              In a nuclear (or big steam) plant, the actual power output can be       reduced by throttling steam and dumping it straight to the condenser       rather than sending it through the turbine, but this is not really an       ideal way of running things. In an ideal world, you would have a       system like Switzerland, where there is nuclear power to cover the       baseload and hydro/pumped storage to manage the peaks. That, however,       requires the kind of geography of Switzerland, that few other countries       can manage.              Robin              --- SoupGate/W32 v1.03        * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca