Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    RAILFAN    |    Trains, model railroading hobby    |    3,261 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,487 of 3,261    |
|    Sancho Panza to Stephen Sprunk    |
|    Re: more fuzzy math, was National FREIGH    |
|    08 Apr 14 19:42:02    |
      From: otterpower@xhotmail.com              On 4/8/2014 7:30 PM, Stephen Sprunk wrote:       > On 08-Apr-14 18:13, Sancho Panza wrote:       >> On 4/8/2014 7:04 PM, Stephen Sprunk wrote:       >>> On 08-Apr-14 16:18, Sancho Panza wrote:       >>>> On 4/8/2014 3:04 PM, Stephen Sprunk wrote:       >>>>> It's trains running on your beloved _freight_ network that lose       >>>>> enormous       >>>>> amounts of money, almost entirely due to lack of capital investment,       >>>>> which hurts both passenger _and_ freight service.       >>>>>       >>>> On the contrary, Union Pacific stock has been quite a strong performer       >>>> for the last several years, and Burlington Northern has not been one of       >>>> Berkshire Hathaway's shabbier contributors, either.       >>>       >>> They don't run passenger trains, except under contracts where they're       >>> guaranteed to turn a profit regardless of performance.       >>>       >> No one said they did. The response was your assertion about losing money       >> on the freight network, which is overwhelmingly involved in moving freight.       >       > That I was referring to passenger trains was obvious, at least until you       > snipped the context so you could deliberately misinterpret it.              And that ties together strong financial performance with "lack of       capital investment" how?              --- SoupGate/W32 v1.03        * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca