Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    RAILFAN    |    Trains, model railroading hobby    |    3,261 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,355 of 3,261    |
|    hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com to John Albert    |
|    Re: Cab Signal safety--1951    |
|    03 Nov 16 11:32:00    |
      On Wednesday, November 2, 2016 at 11:47:44 PM UTC-4, John Albert wrote:       > Cab signals and speed control (until the Metro-North       > accident) applied ONLY to signal indications (i.e., would       > apply brakes if engineman did not take appropriate action       > after passing a more restrictive signal indication).       >       > After the Spyten Duyvil wreck, Metro-North installed cab       > signal "drops" approaching certain speed restrictions. These       > operate independently of signal indications.              However, it sounds to be relatively trivial to install a slower       signal at a serious speed restriction to force a slowdown, as       MetroNorth did. Simply change the most permissive aspect on       a signal from proceed to a slower speed.              It also seems rather simple to add on more aspects than the 1951       technology; I think its fastest was 45 mph for approach limited.              --- SoupGate/W32 v1.03        * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca