From: ce11son@yahoo.ca   
      
   On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 11:44:25 -0800 (PST), henhanna@gmail.com wrote:   
      
   >   
   >I'd think (shortly after the accident)   
   >   German-language newspapers and   
   >   German-language discussion sites had comments on her   
   >    possible carelessness.  I'd love to see some of those.   
   >   
   >   
   >I think I heard that in some jurisdictions (in the past),   
   >   any [contributory negligence] by the injured   
   >              bars any claim by the injured.   
   >   
   >  Is this common in Europe?   
   >   
   In the three jurisdictions in the UK damages can be apportioned to   
   both the pursuer/claimant and the defendant.   
      
   >      This is long gone in all of US, right?   
   >   
   >   
   >On Wednesday, December 9, 2015 at 11:59:27 AM UTC-8, Stephen Sprunk wrote:   
   >.......   
   >   
   >> >> Fakt sei aber, dass "auf fahrende Züge" "nicht aufgesprungen werden"   
   dürfe.   
   >>   
   >> Google Translate is having trouble with that portion, so I'm not sure   
   >> what it means.   
   >   
   >   ( the original S (sentence) contains 2 auf's )   
   >   
   >The Fact is (remains) that one should   
   >          "not jump onto"   "onto a moving train".   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >I'm not sure about the quotes.   it may be that   
   >   
   >1. those portions are quoted from (common) signs in train-stations.   
   >   
   >  or   
   >   
   >2. (only) those portions are quoted from the OBB spokesperson   
   >            (the gender is male in the original)   
   >   
   >HH   
      
   --- SoupGate/W32 v1.03   
    * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1)