Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    RAILFAN    |    Trains, model railroading hobby    |    3,261 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,823 of 3,261    |
|    hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com to All    |
|    History--impact of passenger station clo    |
|    21 May 15 10:03:52    |
      In the 1950s and 1960s, many passenger trains were abandoned. Along with that       was the closure of many passenger stations on branchlines or even main lines       that would no longer have passenger service.              What was the impact, if any, on local communities when that happened?              At one time, the small town railroad station was a center of town life. But       after WW II, conditions changed and the depot was less important.              One loss was the elimination of Western Union service to the town; service       that had been provided by the station agent. About 1,000 such WU agents were       eliminated in that time frame. The impact from that is hard to measure       because telegram traffic        overall fell dramatically in the years following WW II, a 10% volume loss       every year. WU rates were rising while toll rates were falling, and       eventually a three-minute long distance voice call cost the same or less than       a telegram, plus allowed two-way        conversation.              The less presented a challenge to Western Union as it was very tightly       regulated by the FCC. While WU didn't have direct control over railroad       stations, it was not allowed to close its own branch offices without FCC       approval, even if the branch had too        little messaging to support itself. The FCC wanted WU to replace closed RR       offices with its own offices, which would've been quite costly for WU.              In later years, when WU wanted to replace teletypewriters with CRT terminals,       it needed to get FCC approval and file new tariffs. Likewise, replacing its       old obsolete electro-mechanical reperforating centers with computerized       switching required FCC        approval, too.              In the 1960s, handling the declining volume of telegrams was very costly for       WU. It foresaw the coming of the internet and hoped to be a backbone provider       of data transmissions. In the 1960s, it was focused on developing       computerized switching and        digital transmissions over its network.                     As an aside, the Bell System provided mobile telephone service aboard the best       passenger trains, such as the Twentieth Century, Broadway Limited, the       Congressionals, among others. As those trains were withrdrawn, the mobile       service on them was        terminated, too. Other than the Metroliner's, which had a new mobile       service*, I don't know if Amtrak _initially_ had any trains with the older       mobile service on them. (Amtrak much later provided cellphone service on some       trains.)              (*The Metroliner service was a pre-cursor to cellular phones, with an       automatic handoff from one tower to the next, transparent to the caller.)              --- SoupGate/W32 v1.03        * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca