Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    RAILFAN    |    Trains, model railroading hobby    |    3,261 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,741 of 3,261    |
|    Stephen Sprunk to Clark F Morris    |
|    Re: Passenger versus freight was Re: Hoo    |
|    10 Apr 15 12:17:28    |
      From: stephen@sprunk.org              On 10-Apr-15 08:54, Clark F Morris wrote:       > hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:       >> On a section of busy bi-directional double track that CSX shares       >> with SEPTA, CSX is spending money to build a third track dedicated       >> for its trains. I think this is foolish. CSX will go from a very       >> fluid two-track line to a single track line that will hurt, not       >> help its freight trains. The two-track line was busy, but not       >> over-crowded, and the bi-directional signalling made it flexible.       >       > Given that SEPTA needs to upgrade to high level platforms for ADA       > and performance reasons, this could make a lot of sense.              For the high platform issue, gauntlet tracks are cheaper and take up a       lot less space than building a separate track, and the performance of       freights will be a lot better if they can still use two tracks, rather       than have to use a single track bidirectionally.              > Differing speed bands and maintenance needs (50 mph heavy haul       > versus 80 - 90 mph every 15 minute or half hourly passenger service)       > can make separate lines the best answer.              No, you just need to learn how to use fixed slots. Those "faster"       commuter trains probably average about the same speed once you factor in       all the stops they make--especially on SEPTA, which has closer stops       than most other "commuter" systems.              Intercity trains they have a much higher average speed, but you _can_       create slots that move at different speeds; the math is a bit more       difficult, but it's still cheaper than additional tracks.              > Switches are expensive.              Not as expensive as adding an entirely new track, especially once you       figure in having to widen every bridge and crossing on the route.              That's why many trunk lines are still mostly single tracked, even though       that requires frequent sidings (with two switches each) for passing.              S              --       Stephen Sprunk "God does not play dice." --Albert Einstein       CCIE #3723 "God is an inveterate gambler, and He throws the       K5SSS dice at every possible opportunity." --Stephen Hawking              --- SoupGate/W32 v1.03        * Origin: LiveWire BBS -=*=- UseNet FTN Gateway (1:2320/1)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca